15 June 2008

Quiet Expropriation

I was out shopping the other day. Not in the normal sense. For me, when shopping feels like shopping it instantly becomes a chore – an unpleasant one at that. I tend more to shop as a sideline, some other task or occupation predominating concurrently. If I were active in hunter-gather times, I would've always needed an alternative excuse to be out there – researching wild life for the next cave paint or some other pre-emption. Shopping comfortably occupies the space of jobs best done when not thought about too much category. My excuse this time was photography – I was out taking images. And I came on my bike, as usual. Nothing strikes you as problematic there. I was with a friend too and we had an (expensive) but delicious lunch at Carluccio's. Oh, and the suit I purchased cost the best part of £300. Still nothing obviously awry. Bike, camera, lunch, clothes shopping. Expenditure in the region of £350. All normal activities on a London afternoon.

But we weren't in London, not any more, not as you expect. We were in the new half western half of Spitalfields. And apparently this is a private estate. Ok, fair enough. Yes, fair enough indeed. For them. You are most welcome on the estate to impart some of your wealth to the businesses there; be they sartorial providers or one of the very nice but rather-too-predictable-to-be-exciting restaurant chains (when did you last see an independent catering business open in a new development?) You are very welcome, as the potential client of all these businesses and hence ultimately The Estate itself. But despite the fact they would be bankrupt without you, you'd better obey their rules.

Every single form of post or railing or any vertical appendage of any kind is emblazoned with its Cycles Forbidden, Private Property sign. There are certainly hundreds of these notices installed; how painful. When the plans were drawn up for this contentious development, and somebody was cooking the deal for the private estate, which turkey in the local authority (presumably the City of London) thought it wouldn't be necessary to oblige them to be bike friendly? At least to compel them to install sufficient bike storage on The Estate. There are pitifully insufficient bike racks in the area, check it out.

So here we are. It's not that charming corner of your city that you love to wander aimlessly around in any more. You are now a visitor on someone else's estate. You must come and spend. Then leave. There is something in this titular reality that is undeniably tainted. Renovated in an impressive style on one hand, albeit too monochrome, this cherished, historical, public district has been ruined on the other. Duly infuriated by all this irrational 'for fuck's sake, don't you get it yet?' antibikeism, I eventually found a suitable lamppost adorning a pavement of an estate-bordering street. Safely on public land. Not so simple. When I returned to my bike, The Agents of The Estate had decorated it with a lovely sticker. My bike was about to be clamped! Bike, clamped, yes that's right. Now near apoplectic, I removed said sticker and stormed upstairs to the Estate Management Office (do these people think they are Sandringham or something?) The agent was, to be fair, more friendly than you would expect nowadays and tried to assure me that my bike was on a private part of the street, not the public zone. The what? He even tried to visually demarcate some invisible border. Unaware I couldn't care less if it belonged to Big Liz herself, he was on and on about the private bloody estate ad nauseum, ad infinitum, ad up your arse-eum. What nonsense is this? Who let this happen? Spitalfields is Spitalfields. It's an old market with a new bit added on. It's full of shops, cafés and restaurants, walkways and piazzas. It's criss-crossed with streets, ancient thoroughfares and rights of way. It's a very strange form of private property indeed.

Irritating, sure, but all a bit predictable really. London 2008 is an increasingly great place to cycle but the antis cling on like some desperate, ousted, huffing aristocracy. The security guard of The Estate actually told me they won't allow people to secure bikes to posts and railings because the owner ... doesn't like the look of them. I was sober. There was no chance of an auditory hallucination; he actually said it. So, sod it, we don't let them get to us with our impermeable duck backs etc. Loving photography, I try to shed the all too familiar feeling of harassment in our fair city and wander off to take photographs. 'Excuse me sir,' came the polite Nigerian accent. 'I'm sorry sir but you cannot take photos in this place.' Gulp. Swallow. Sigh. 'This is a private estate.' I immediately have one of those visions of someone committing spontaneous murder with a heavy frying pan that you see in films. That moment when your characteristic cool is suddenly annihilated by pettiness and it all gets far too much. Fortunately I didn't quite lose it so; at least I had no suitable Le Creuset in easy reach. But I wasn't having any of this nonsense either. You just, sometimes, have to fight back. 'I'm sorry, what are you talking about? Of course I can take photographs here,' I calmly, politely reply. 'No sir, sorry you can't. Well, it depends, it depends on the camera. You need to write in for permission.' I'm starting to wonder if I'd taken the wrong turn and unwittingly biked to Narnia. Or Berlin, circa 1940. What the flock? By all accounts, if you have a small camera then it's fine, but if we're talking an SLR then we have a problem. Some mobile phones have cameras not significantly inferior to my SLR these days, but that's not the point. I didn't give in. I stayed polite and full of smiles but carried on taking photos.

The guard left me alone. But the problem lingered – it was hard to not let them ruin the day. In so many tiny but innumerable ways life in London is so controlled. In isolation, every measure is tolerable, often justifiable and easy to comprehend. Cumulatively, it's becoming insufferable. We are increasingly disenfranchised such that trying to enjoy our city is becoming a veritable challenge. Resist. It's your city. Love it as you want to. As it happens, I'm writing this in Barcelona. Chatting to an acquaintance last night who plans to move here without delay, I ask why. The answer simple: 'I'm over London, I can't bear all the rules any more.' Amen.

21 May 2008

Grasshopper's Revenge

It’d been at least five years since I was in the socioeconomic experiment known as the Rainbow Nation; returning a joy. That combination of developed and developing (whatever those narrow worldview terms are meant to describe) undeniably makes for a very different kind of trip. Since I started dating men instead of women, I must also admit there’s been a bit of a theme with this neck of the woods, so ok maybe that’s part of it too (I’ve been single for ages now…). Ms S was so helpful on VS601 from London Hellthrow to Johannesburg. The gentleman who'd enterprisingly improvised an economy flatbed in the middle block of the 747, at possibly a tenth the price of the equivalent in Upper Class, was already determinedly inviting sleep five minutes after take off. Ms S, being a diligent and efficient cabin service team member (air stewardess, thanks) advised he attach a seat belt before sleeping, lest she had to disturb him later. But Ms S is a serious girl and goes the extra mile; in she climbs to free that belt and buckle him down good and tight. What service! Quite a lot of fuss. Being the nosey bugger I am, I can't prevent myself observing a slight rouge-ing on Ms S’s fair cheeks. Oh, now was that a cheeky wink as she bids her passenger a good night? Said passenger being a gorgeous South African Hunk of course. You were in row 38 if you are reading this. Cheeky Ms S, good on you girl, although I do wonder if some greasy corpulent one would be quite so well seen to. I don’t bother trying it on in the vain hope of winging some service treats – Ms S is a seasoned cabin crew professional and can spot a gayer far quicker than me. 10 hours and I wonder how much carbon later, some circumstantial realities are immediately apparent on arrival. The airport functions well, but there lingers a hint of chaos somewhere, maybe infused in the walls. But South Africans are clean people, verging on the maniac; hence people are wiping and scrubbing all available surfaces. Labour supply is high and therefore cost is low, resulting in 2-women teams everywhere, one mopping, the other drying alongside, wafting whatever comes to hand. I couldn’t help noticing that everything was already spotless though. And the smiling – South Africans (on the whole) are incredibly smiley people and by gum does that make you feel good after a decent dose of ubiquitous London arse-slapped faceness. Londoners are now only able to smile at strangers on internet dating photographs. It’s official. All fundamental interactions are radically different here – impromptu conversation is usually accompanied with rather prolonged eye contact. Again, a soothing antidote for a Mancunian like me. Jo’burg’s airport has been renamed, again. Previously Jan Smut’s became Johannesburg International. Minority government references safely substituted with a pure location-function designation. Arguably better. Now it’s going back the other way, kind of. I don’t like it when people name airports after individuals. I’ve nothing against tributes. Tributes can be beautiful. A four hundred year old tree, ok, but not an airport. However this time it’s only gone half way and we’ve two names combined: Johannesburg OR Tambo. It took me over two weeks to overcome my ignorance and realise OR signifies someone’s initials and not ‘alternatively’. In the meantime, with OR meaning or and not O.R., every road sign bemused me with their apparent need to continually emphasise the alternative name. Why are you capitalising OR? If it’s that important, just rename it; ban the old name if you must, on pain of Robben Island. 5 hours later, across the expanses of the Free State under that gigantic sky, we were rollicking with lion cubs. Giant kittens. Difficult to find something more South African. Never mind the boerwors, we were playing with lions. It’s an amazing but simultaneously confusing experience. At 3 months they are impressively strong and their precocious claws demand strategic care, but otherwise they are identical to kittens; the equivalence with the family moggy unsettlingly acute. The knowledge, hard to acknowledge, that these ever playful but slightly dangerous fluffballs develop to occupy the top of the food chain real estate imparts a precious sense of wonder. We were actually on a lion farm – those words not appearing to sit well together in the same sentence. Lion breeding centre sounds better, at the risk of being euphemistic. Unsurprisingly, the industry (there are now 90 lion farms in the Free State alone) is not without controversy, in some cases deservedly I expect. Breeding lions in captivity so a tourist can shoot them raises plenty issues. If the odds were more equitable (notwithstanding the artifice of firearms), I’d find it harder to object; although not necessarily impossible. But a Disneyesque pursuit of a not-quite-wild lion in a not exactly savanna-scale enclosure (“canned lion”) I find simply pathetic and somewhat sickening. But happily we weren’t visiting such an enterprise. We were at a White Lion breeding centre where the animals were destined for game parks or zoos. The opportunity to be in their presence feeling like a simple honour. Continuing the theme of animal rights, some days later, following the kind of spectacular sunset that makes you wonder how anyone ever thought the world was flat, I transgressed at the other end of the food chain. I ate my first grasshopper. Alive and all. A pathetic victim to peer pressure, I submitted and crunched the arthropod dead and then swallowed. Not a disgusting flavour at all; a hint of bitterness a bit like chicory, a flavour whose popularity I've never understood (but I’ve never had to do without coffee in a world war). Locals are known to cook and eat grasshopper in this part of the world, so the interest to try is real. Just like a non-frenchy’s first frog's leg. But, while later trying to get to sleep, revenge was sweet as another one or maybe ten kept jumping on my head. Either that or another example of the spectacular panoply of jojos you find out here on the edge of the Kalahari in north west South Africa. The lodge, reassuringly basic but outstandingly beautiful, perches on one of the part-vegetated deep orange sand dunes that radiate across the tree-peppered veld in this land. This is exactly the kind of place you need to experience this environment. You’ve got what you need, including what could be the best ever view from the shower, but no more, nothing to pollute the essential. I have always found this landscape unexpectedly alluring. Intrinsically, it’s monotonous: slightly undulating, dichromatic, with a random but predictable distribution of bos. But it relaxes the eye and calms the soul. Here the day retracts to the underworld after bidding a deep orange farewell. The eyes then only gently excited by the campfire and the comfortingly intimidating wallpaper of the Milky Way. Sleep isn’t far, notwithstanding the grasshopper’s revenge. Agriculture out here is unrecognisable to me, having grown up amongst the dairy farms on the valance of the Peak District. Farms meant lots of lovely black and white Friesian moo-moos atop a bright green (often wet) field – there are none left now, I think all the milk must come from Poland. These black and white mowers comprise such a lovely evocation that Hackney council now paints its big street bins Friesian colours. It wasn’t all innocent-smoothie-esque teletubs farmy-warmy though; there was getting drenched in intrauterine slop during calving and the omnipresent, omni-odoriferous cowshit. Nevertheless, a newborn calf sucking on your fingers is not something easily forgotten. Unsimilarly, farming in the semi-desert Kalahari is defined by its rareness – rare as in the antonym of dense. The Europeanised name, Kalahari, derives from Kgalgadi, place of dryness in Tswana. Farms here are almost indistinguishable from the surrounding bush. At times you may be lucky to spot a cow – it requires fifteen hectares to rear a single one here – but the farms’ real imprint on the giant fingerprint of these dunes is the wind-powered water pumps. Standing tall under the impertinent sun, ever patient for the wind, they both demarcate distance and reassure the existence of water. One morning, we had to go and fix one. Not that I’ve ever done that either but it felt like prospecting for oil (although it’s for the underground metal deposits that the region is mined). Six men, a backie, an improvised crane + pulley exploiting a telegraph pole, lots of sweat and grease and an hour later the coaxial Archimedes screw had surfaced from a depth of more than fifty metres; the offending puncture, all of five millimetres wide, sneeringly grinning at our effort. We replaced the broken pipe and winched the bore back in its unfittingly wet conduit. The men reengaged the motor (this one was electric) and we waited, trying not to only hope it had worked. The water gushed out to our (or definitely my) unquantifiable relief. To this bore’s hinterland at least, the subterranean aquatic lifeline had been restored and the land was viable again. Such is the crucial dependence of insolated, sandy surface on isolated, humid depth here on the edge of the desert. Matters and hearts lightened, we backie-surfed back to the farmhouse. Sheila the sheepdog always mans the back of the backie, nose out to the bush, her higher senses always alert, a canine version of the Lancaster bomber’s watchman. Living with dogs for a week (there are 6 on the farm, of all shapes and sizes) almost perfected this Kalahari experience. The ostrich, the missing essential characteristic in this locality, had all ‘left’ since my last visit, again choosing not to fly but wander off elsewhere. However the farmers now insist on their reintroduction – it’s simply not a Kalahari farm without them (we did see a neighbour’s brood though). So the dogs, from mini Jack Russell to giant Mastif, 8 to 80 kg, accompanied us at all times, their different personalities and aptitudes projecting onto different functions through the week. The big girls, Frumples and Rumples (roll the r), specialise in noise and stature (as massive, very scary guard dogs) and slow, strong, insistent affection, their signature piece an extremely destabilising lean. Sharing a single bed with such a massive creature is quite a challenge, but one that became harder to avoid as the week progressed and the dogless days approached. I’m usually not a huge Jack Russell fan, the utility of this small extremity of dogworld was not previously apparent. But the dog was surely champion when its size, speed and agility enabled it to instantaneously bisect a very dangerous zebra snake that had taken refuge outside the kitchen door one evening. Talk, and awareness, of deadly snakes is necessary culture in much of Africa. But encounters remain thankfully unusual; a disarmed lethally-venomous reptile perfectly chopped in half by the family dog even rarer. If, like me, you grew up with dogs and haven’t yet engineered a way to incorporate them into your predominantly urban life, then a week like this is effective therapy. But then you have to leave them. They should run a kind of package tour for people like me. You go somewhere gorgeous and walk dogs day and night. Should be available on the NHS, like social services taking asbo-trophy kids from Croydon to Chile, that favourite anathema of the Daily Hate. From Gemsbok (Oryx), Springbok and Cattle, thru Dog, Ostrich and Snake; on to Horse. I’ve never officially been taught to horse ride. I was given a crash course on this very farm about 5 years previously. It’s definitely the way to do it. Yes of course trotting hurts the arse a bit, even with harmonious timing; rising horse - falling arse antiphase-resonance is to be avoided at all cost if you want to preserve your pelvis. But galloping here across these sandy dunes provides a reassuring introduction. Possibly hopelessly naïve, but the thought of an equine ejection, I said ejection, is not so scary with the sandy soft-standing underfoot. Full pelt across the veld. Exquisite. We could combine this with the dog walking. I feel an eco-tour coming on. Heartbreakingly leaving this unexpectedly hospitable land, later on I was driving up the NI to Johannesburg in heavy Sunday night traffic. Like the airport name, the N1 says a much about South Africa today. As a highway, it has been significantly improved; the wide, smooth black tarmac forms a major artery connecting Jo’burg to its surrounds. A fast, safely constructed, modern road. About 60km south of the city however, the road traverses a danger zone. The nature of the risk not conspicuously apparent, but denoted by a regular series of large warning signs – obstructions in road! – and an 80 km/h speed limit. What’s going on? Improvised road blocks. This part of south Gauteng (itself not paradoxically an anagram of get a gun), suffers much violent crime. One such activity involves blocking the NI with rocks and then committing all manner of horribleness to the car, its contents and its occupants. Nothing ensues of course as I drive through – the statistical probability of anything actually happening to a visitor in South Africa remains low – but such signs are a reminder of a grimmer reality in this state of eleven official languages, but also a marker that it is not being totally ignored. On to Cape Town. Obviously, by virtue of its geographical-geological situation more than anything else, an apparently small town that happens to be a world city. I got there courtesy of one of SA’s low-cost, Kumala. If there is one reason I was happy with this airline, it’s for the simple reason that when it comes to irrationally ridiculous safety announcements regulation, they clearly took the piss: “In the clearly impossible event of a landing on water, …”. “If an oxygen mask drops from above your head, stop screaming and put it over your mouth.” Yes they really did say all that, and more, and my how it was refreshing. The Economist would be proud. It’s far too big a subject to get into right now but there’s a cavalier, more maverick approach to life in SA. I’m not unconditionally supporting – look at the road death stats for example (look at the driving!) – but when you’ve had enough of the H&S / constant vigilance / politics of fear of current urban Britain and similar then it’s like taking a cool shower after mending a water pump under the African sun. Ok I’m sure it often goes too far, but the more relaxed and less regimented attitude to life is so invigorating. And I’m British, not German. Britain has changed. Cape Town in the new SA. The same, shockingly beautiful situation, clinging to the side of a very odd mountain just before it plunges into the icy sea (shame, that last point). Now it’s mixed, very. Much more than I remember before. It’s African. Even the plane down here was maybe 60% non-white. Such things still feel quite new and yes, regrettably, some whites were looking on in what can only be described as bewilderment. In Cape Town, you hear Xhosa everywhere, something I love. In rural SA, it’s not obvious much has changed. The poor blacks have, if anything, according to some, a rougher deal than before. But then there is, for example, the enormous house building, employment rights and electricity distribution programs, whose increased demand is undeniably connected to the now regular California-style blackouts. But apparently health care for the lowest socioeconomic class has gone to the dogs. In the Kalahari we learnt of a young boy who’d died, presumably of internal bleeding, after being kicked in the groin during football. He’d twice been ferried 150km to the nearest hospital only for the doctor to turn him away as it was Sunday. Speechless. In a place like Cape Town there are still countless poor non-whites of course, most still concealed in the expansive Cape Flats, but there is now a clearly visible black middle class – and more. It’s inevitable, expected and indeed an economic aim, as it should be. But I hope the innumerable chronically poor don’t get forgotten in this complicated new land. But as the government’s past attitude to the HIV that is ravaging the country can really only be explained as a turn-blind-eye, slow, incidental genocide then care and regard for the poor don’t strike you as an administrative priority. For those that think I’m being hysterical then how else would they explain the Minister of Health advocating Rooibos tea (or whatever it was) as an antiviral, clearly knowing it is an evil, malicious, murderous lie. It’s as bad as reports of catholic missionaries in Africa preaching that condoms contain holes and are therefore useless. Further on the endemic HIV, until Africa in general de-taboos and discusses its active clandestine homosexual activity (which surely has undoubtedly contributed to such a widespread transmission of the virus, and let’s not even start on dry sex) and embraces safer sex of any kind, then the whole damn thing is near hopeless and millions will die. Ah, but then that’s maybe not a problem to the government of such a budget-stretched overpopulated country? But Cape Town, that magical city (for the whites, strangely, English speaking out to a radius of only 5 km before returning to Afrikaans), carries on. The table still presides and the beautiful beaches still beckon. Ok, around Kloof St some of the whites are so irritatingly pretentious that they can compete with Miami, and the crack dealing on Long Street isn’t so lovely, but Cape Town remains intoxicatingly amazing. It’s still the world’s best big-town-city. During this visit adjacent Zimbabwe attempted its last election. In fact, as we know, the election was entirely successful. However, while I’m writing this, as you know, the debacle isn’t over and the despot clings on – of course what else would he do? And the international community, predominantly featuring Zimbabwe’s neighbours, remains apathetic. I did see one shining protest however, tucked away in the Cape Town National Art Gallery. This photo, taken by an SA artist, is of a stuffed baboon that locals in a border town on the Limpopo have made up as Mugabe. Living right next door, they see enough of the economic side effects of his Machiavellian reign. Some may be shocked and presume the installation is playing a racist card, black equals monkey bollocks. That’s not what this is about at all. The image visually paraphrases the very ridiculousness and viciousness of Mugabe’s presidency. And this image is in South Africa’s national gallery. Baboons can be clever and very nasty when they are in need. And such creatures should never be presidents. The expulsion and retribution of Zimbabwe’s incumbent is critical for all of Southern Africa’s future. As I leave South Africa, I beg that they get the fucker out.

17 March 2008

Deep Snow and Inappropriate Behaviour

Really you knew it wouldn’t be a problem-free journey day – the Met Office had been issuing severe storm warnings for the previous 24 hours. But that predeparture online check of the airport status together with the Stansted Express service report uncovered no delays, so I left home thinking we’d got away with it. Naturally, my internet-enabled reassurance intrinsically lacked forecasting ability; by the time I’d got Grandad to Liverpool Street, they were announcing delays. Grandad is my ski bag, not a relative, so-named as dragging it around the world reminds me of towing a coffin on wheels. A bit sick maybe. Grandad, a friend and I waited for news. All have felt it, especially when attempting to reach London Stansted: that irrepressible realisation that it’s problematic at a far higher frequency than chance. It’s not just you, getting to Stansted is never easy. I think it has something to do with the silly train company name – One – that shares Liverpool Street with the Stansted Express. The train Gods are so ruffled by someone using mobile phone marketing naffness in naming a train operating company that they have cursed the whole station. It’s not the Express’s fault; it’s a bad karma externality spilling over from the world’s silliest train company name.

Although getting there is often a pain, I like Stansted – possibly my favourite London airport. It’s the high roof and unusual lack of BAA’s speciality: carpet in a bloody airport. Who in their right mind would ever recommend such as a useful floorcovering? But about Stansted, not all agree. Some prefer the megaMalls you find elsewhere. I once overheard a well-heeled young woman complaining to her (posh hen party?) co-travellers that she just… doesn’t like Stansted… it’s boring. More chronic Londonesque vacuity me thinks. Oh dear. Give me a boring airport any day.

Ah hah! The nice people at Liverpool Street give us 2 minutes notice that the service is restored and the train is leaving. Running down the escalator (outside McD’s having a fag you see) and on to the train with Grandad not an easy exercise, but we manage. The train, packed with anxious voyagers, is relieved to pull out of the station and escape the company of its One peers. Wagons roll, everyone checks their scheduled take off times just that 31st extra time. Relaxation creeps in. And then excretes out like norovirus: there’s a tree on the overhead lines ahead. We are herded off the train at some station ill-equipped to cope with such an invasion of passengers and luggage, never mind Grandad. A beautiful soul picks up the other end and helps me navigate the stairs to get the replacement bus. Only joking, the train is running again. Just wait until everyone is off the train flowing en masse over the stairs like a thwarted lava flow and then tell them to change direction; the ensuing chaotic mix of stress, exasperation and tangled luggage akin to a giant version of Jenga. Some get apoplectic; others resigned to yet more nonsense try and pretend it isn’t happening. It’s still not 8am. We somehow all get back on board and arrive at Stansted. Nearly 2 hours later. The tree? No, a One train has broken down ahead. If it could talk, we know what it would say.

Oh-how-we-love-your-colour-scheme Ryanair couldn’t help. Check in had closed although the plane was still on the ground for another 40 minutes. The get what you pay for lesson hits hard when you are exposed to budget airlines under conditions of duress. One poor woman was left stranded as her check in had closed despite the fact that her flight on an unspecified airline was delayed and would not leave for another 2 hours. Simply shameless and disingenuous - putting it unnecessarily politely. Others may prefer the label: dirty, cheating, lowlife, scummy bastards - up to you. How can they do that? Why do they do that? Deny boarding to someone who is (in the real world and not airline lalaland) actually 2 hours early?

When you step back and examine the evolved solution to the problem of getting people and bags on and off planes – what we know as airports – it comes clear that they are excellent at impeding those very processes. In some ways they are a perfect anti-solution. Check-ins have to close early to give you time to get through security and reach the gate. That security, which, according to insiders, is no more than theatre and regularly fails any significant test. But you still have to negotiate the terminal building and get to the gate. Next time you visit just look how much obstruction and obstacle is carefully placed in your way by retail infrastructure. It is not unusual for people exiting security to be directly and involuntarily diverted into the narrow aisles of duty free. In such circumstances, it is your duty to humanity to crash through that shop with your bags causing as much destruction as possible. Then if some Tango Man make-up lookielikie from Clinique accosts you for a multistage facial regeneration I advise you feign a panic attack and discharge on the floor. If the orange face is so shocking you can spontaneously vomit. You want to be in the airport the minimum time possible. The airport wants exactly the inverse – your unnecessary expenditure being directly proportional to the time available.

Ryanair offered us a flight the next day, for a healthy supplement. There were other, possibly orange, airlines offering flights to our desired location (well, ‘near’ anyway) the same day but of course, no, nothing could be done. Any claims would have to be taken up with the train company. We wash our hands of you. Thanks for flying we don’t care airlines. We appreciate you have an apparent choice of other similarly low cost / you’ll pay far more in the end airlines and we appreciate your custom. Goodbye.

Laptop out and we rebooked on the orange flying bus. Twice the price of the missed flight. Not Grenoble unfortunately but Genève. Same letter and same mountain range at least. Then I got onto Avis to change the car hire booking. Oh dear oh deary me: different drop-off location as we’ve changed the arrival leg airport. Equals big supplement. My, how the costs were growing. Faster than China’s GDP at this rate. Budget airline. Low cost airline. Oxymoronic Airways if you please.

But we got to Genève eventually. Even made it to the chalet just in time for a late dinner. The mountains surround, their ancient, stony majesty imparts their dominance and our earlier concerns fade with the day. It starts to snow. The growing blanket outdoors ironically exudes warmth as we drift off to sleep. Just a flicker of irritation resides: Eurostar goes to Bourg St Maurice: an 8 hour journey from London and then 10 min drive from here. We’d left Liverpool Street 12 hours before knocking on the door of wonderful Chalet No. 1. Ho hum.

As you may know, snow and I are not exactly strangers. So the fact that I still get that childlike thrill when rising to see a new, thick white blanket through the window is priceless. The others had arrived – admittedly with problem-free aviation compared to us. We shared a lovely breakfast in the charming grange, seasoned with the excited anticipation of a snowsport trip’s first morning. Day one and still one down from the full nascent team, we stayed close and drove up to Sainte Foy Tarentaise. Sainte Foy’s a lovely little place to ski. Only 4 (chair)lifts and admittedly 3 of those are so slow I can develop a temper, but the area is superb, the runs fun and the offpiste fantastic. It’s a gorgeous place to ski for a day or two. If you are tired of the big boys of the Tarentaise, St Foy is the perfect antidote enneigée.

Next night and the team is complete - completion being more hazardous than I’d conceived. Living in London I effect a good 99% of my journeys by bicycle, so I allowed myself a carbon splurge with a big fat 4x4, for once appropriate as we were staying up a steep, narrow mountain road (yes, we know Hampstead is hilly, but really). Besides, it was diesel. And only 2 litre. But carbon footprints weren’t all I should’ve worried about with such a vehicle. Rearward visibility was a more pressing issue. Setting off to pick up team mate number four, I reversed over a small car. Worse, at the sound I thought it was just a cardboard box. Ok, I exaggerate slightly as the result was just 2 shot bumpers. But I permit myself some indulgence as I had to interrogate the entire restaurant to identify the driver whose vehicle I had just violated.

Over the next three days we completed something of a Tarentaise Marathon, sliding and carving, sometimes tumbling, down the mountainsides of Val d’Isère, La Rosière and Tignes. It’s not the most faffless way to ski; you don’t just walk to the closest lift and you have to buy a day pass tous les matins. And clever us hired equipment in 2 different resorts, so returning everything on the last evening engendered logistics reminiscent of Challenge Anneka. Time and resource scarcity can also lead to inappropriate but unavoidable urination in underground carparks (sorry). But this flavour of winter holiday is undeniably fun, interestingly varied and it’s a cool way to check out places to ski again.

Our day in Val d’Isère was embellished with hurricane force gusts at the top of Bellevarde. But our team, not to be disheartened, braved it all and we got our lesson in. Having feasted at the unbeatable Dairy (La Fruiterie), we had more than a fair allocation of calories to burn. Burnt they were, all in beautiful piste-bound powder, although admittedly most of the time we couldn’t see the ground. Visibility’s for lightweights apparently. But weight did become an issue later in the day. Desperately trying to get the last run in, as you do if like us you feel a sense of achievement if you board the first lift before 11, we exited the too-good-for-words Funival mountain tube train up in the storm. Peering out through the station exit tunnel’s aperture had an ethereal cinematic quality. The storm had strengthened significantly and the opening resembled a windtunnel observation porthole. Thinking (hoping) it was a gust, albeit a worrying one, we pierced the wall of wind. Defiantly trying to gain some anchor and attach whatever equipment, we grew more concerned by the sub 5 metre visibility. Witnessing a light member of our party being lifted off the ground like a sweet wrapper and transported a metre or two decided our immediate future: back down in the lift. Relieved and full of giggles. Thank god.

Another day, another weather. Fresh powder everywhere, blinding sunshine radiating from a brilliant sky. A toothpaste stripe day: deep blue ciel hugging a clean white montagne – the cherished prize rewarded after a few days of mountain storm. Up in La Rosière, la domaine straddling the Franco-Italian border, nothing but La Poudreuse. I love the way that cross-border ski areas (I much prefer that adjectival use, rather than the more personally-familiar cross-border finance) make a mockery of national boundaries. It’s one of those precious frontier turn-a-blind-eye grey areas escaping any notion of control: fingerprinting, iris scans or other superfluous agents of oppression. One just skis across, literally free as a bird. No security and definitely no duty free. My very-keen intermediate group of ski buddies being ever prêt pour tout, we agreed it was time for a deep snow baptism. La Rosière, on the right day, is near perfect for such an initiation. Medium gradient, relatively obstruction-free slopes abound between the pistes, on that morning all supporting a nice new half metre of deep-snow. The transition from the edging, carving feel of on piste to the floating lift of deep snow takes a while. The inevitable stalls, face-plants and near-total burials mark necessary milestones along the way. But the group did me proud and after a while looked like they’d been at it for years. Surfing in freshly-fallen snow; arguably superior to sex. Such a wonderful sight to behold. I’m not sure the buggers should’ve got it for free.

La Fin

PS:

Since my time as a ski gumbie, I’ve been a huge fan of Tignes, Val D’Isère’s partner in the Espace Killy. One important point though: avoid
Le Palet mountain restaurant, at the top of the Tichot chairlift. They tempt you in with an inviting terrace. But then get you with a near indigestible mockery of an elsewhere delicious Tartiflette for near €20. Better light lunch and then feast yourself down the valley at the Savoyard gastrodome of Chez Marie, Le Miroir, St Foy Tarentaise.

For a multi-resort ski trip I can’t recommend Chalet No. 1 more highly. Lovely owners, wonderful staff and less than 30 min drive from Val D’Isère/Tignes, St Foy, La Rosière, Les Arcs, La Plagne, …, … And remember Eurostar may be quicker than the flying bus.

Someone has read my mind: One Railways has just become National Express East Anglia

11 February 2008

Up in the Downs

Humanity displays richness. Richness evokes a scale, a range. Ranges have positive and negative extremes, as does humanity. An example of this can be extracted from a most marvellous mountain biking trip on the South Downs yesterday.

Following a popular route in the environs of Steyning, West Sussex, a friend and I climbed on to the escarpment above the river Adur in the glorious sunshine reminiscent of May, not early Feb. Unwittingly taking a wrong turn at one point (maybe my cartophilia does not always match up to my map reading skills), we ended up on a track classified as 'footpath' and not 'bridleway'. For those not familiar with the over-significant ramifictions of this difference for mountain bikers, well... Simply put, by default you can bike on a bridleway but not on footpaths. In mapland this makes long dashed lines good, short dashes/dots naughty. Of course in fact you can ride on some footpaths and rarely does the classification have any bearing on the suitability of mountain bikers and walkers sharing the same route anyway.

But, on a footpath we were. Naughty bikers. Slap slap. We passed a local walker. He didn't scold us, as I thought he might, but he did warn us of the booby traps. 'The booby traps?' We inquired. 'Yes', he retorted, 'there are those that set branches to knock you guys off.' We thanked him for the warning and made on. Then it dawned on me how horrendous this actually was. Some would cause an accident in order to anonymously express their dislike of mountain bikers. Any accident could theoretically have fatal consequences. But simply by introducing a little temporal separation and the innocent agent of a branch, there are those who are certainly prepared to do this. At first inconsequential, on reflection it becomes plainly horrifying. Evil really. In the true, non-religious sense. Mountain bikers have humanity too though. So they can also be bad. Maybe the secret bike trapper had once been forced to jump for their life by an irresponsible cyclist thundering down with similar disregard for other's safety. But, even, if so offended, would trapping be your solution? People can go very far when no-one is looking.

Back up on the South Downs' ridge, that magnificent undulating backbone seemingly guarding inland Sussex from the sea, we regained legal status by rejoining the bridleway. Phew. At least there had been no surveillance drones buzzing overhead to record our misdemeanours. Not yet, in any case. Don't laugh, they are already in use. In your world. Your same world that now sanctions the abominable practice of indiscriminate sonic repellent apparatus to remove 'hoodies' from your environment. Free of surveillance and trespassing guilt, we headed up to Chanctonbury Ring, an unbeatable piece of Iron Age real estate. What a place to sit and contemplate the sea. England, oh England.


After a 'it's not just a picnic, it's an M&S picnic' picnic (all very nice indeed but £3.69 for some sliced mango, oh please, I'd rather shitter adverts and lower prices), it was time for some bone shaking downhill, the delicious reward for a lung- and leg-lambasting ascent. The wet ground, the vertiginous descent ahead. The risk, the danger; the thrill. Ah, the walkers heading uphill. Conflict, disapproval, Xhosa-esque tut-tutting à la Sussex? I slowed to pass. The elderly couple retreated to the shelter of the path's edge. 'Don't worry, you go for it love,' she screamed. Faith in humanity restored, we thundered down.

8 February 2008

Bleating marvellous

Well, last night was different; I took two goats out in central London. Yes, goats. 2 beautiful, happy pygmy goats: Goats' first night out. As accoutrements for a night out in London Town they were certainly original.

How the hell did this happen then? As often, pretty randomly. Friend of friend has just launched Buzzmygoat. Friend owns said goats (more like dogs with hooves really), who both have an enviable - and quiet - life in Bucks. Friend of friend launches website yesterday and celebrates in London Bridge's Shunt Vaults. Hence Buzzmygoat launch party, with real goats.

If there's any London venue better for such a cloven escapade, I'd love you take me there. When it comes to off the wall (under the floor), you can't beat Shunt. I've wanted to go for ages but kept missing the opportunity. Sprawling across a labyrinth of vaults burrowing under London Bridge station, the place is literally fantastic. It's a bar, art installation, performance space cum 'grown-up ghost-train minus the tack' all in one. Quite simply the most fascinating social space I have ever seen. Achingly-trendy artista caps off to all who are behind it.

The billys being as precious as they are, they bleatingly insisted on a subtle stage door entrance. In true Z-list celeb style they discretely slipped out of the van into one of those godforsaken tunnel streets under the station. My only regret was not being accosted by the police seeking an explanation of why we were unloading goats from a white van underneath a major London interchange. I would've loved to see the paperwork. A personal highlight, on arrival, was the security guy's radio soundbite: "ok, Jim, the goat people are here."

Bipedal sans-hooves otherwise enter Shunt via London Bridge tube station, which, interestingly, actually contains a street - Joiner St. From here, equipped with one of those lovely mini maglites, you nervously navigate through the dark smoky (alas, not tobacco) tunnels passing many quirky, interesting hidden surprises along the way. I'm not going to over describe, it'll spoil the fun. Just go.

But one bovid surprise the vaulters didn't expect to see last night was Gavin and Henry, nonchalantly hanging out in the lounge, visibly unphased and enjoying all the attention (precious, remember) but nevertheless wondering where the grass was.

It's a night I'll remember for ever, I wonder if they will.

31 January 2008

Data collections

I'm not likely to start trumping the Conservative party's current claim to being the better crime reduction team. For starters we already have a prison system crisis and the Conservative's likely stated policy of being 'tougher' on crime (increasing sentencing?) would appear nothing more than an unfeasible thought experiment.

The Form












But David Cameron does have one particularly good point about the police: the paperwork. The police, often justifiably, have to fill in and provide a copy of quite a form when they interact with a member of the public. There's a 'stop and search' form, which under circumstances where your person has been inspected by an officer then fair enough both parties have a record of the encounter. However, there is also a 'stop' form, whose lack of utility and time wasting potential is far more paramount.

I have quite an example. In the photo above you can see 'My Stop Form', so how did I end up with this? Taking photos. Of a Public Building (photo below). Shock horror, etc. To be fair, the police did have some albeit tenuous grounds of 'suspicion'. I was in my hometown of Manchester out for the day taking photographs, because that is what I do sometimes. One of the buildings I thought of adding to the ever growing gigabytes of jpegs (that god only knows how I will keep on top of) is in the other photo below. Now, despite me being (quite a proud, we do that) Mancunian I didn't have the faintest idea that this building was in fact the Court House, another Mancunian-at-home characteristic I expect. As I approached from the side, I also had even less idea that there was an important Father's 4 Justice case going on that day. In retrospect, there were quite a lot of police around the area, but that isn't necessarily anything unusual these days, hence I didn't attach any significance. However the police did and called out to me.

Now we could fast forward a full 15 minutes in time and lose nothing significant in the process. Myself and the officer bid each other farewell and went on our business. The police were reassured that I was a local (it says Accent: 'Northern' on the form) photographer doing what it says on the tin. I was just ever so slightly disgruntled for being disturbed but not distraught at my treatment by the Bill. So why the quarter hour? The bloody form of course. What a joke! The officer had accurately ascertained the insignificance of my presence in the first 5 microseconds of our meeting. We talked, I showed him some pics on my camera (the benefit - or the disadvantage? - of digital photography) and that should have been that. But no, some bureaucrat, likely inexperienced in any such grass roots activity as being on The Beat, has prescribed the 'stop' form. In this case, how silly. What a typical waste of time. Mine and theirs.

The police have nothing to gain by having a record of this 'stop'. If some poor temp has to enter it into a database then there is no value in the information stored. Of course unless someone, cough, 'loses' the data and has all that marketing information to sell, but that's another story. If I really wanted a written record of the conversation then I should be able to request it. But in such an inconsequential situation why is the officer obliged to complete the form? It's just more not-thought-through-properly nonsense.

I wonder how many 15 minute slots are wasted in the UK every day by this palava? Equating how many man-hours of police time? You never know, if the police only used the form when either party requested, the cost saved could make up the shortfall in the police pay negotiation. Interesting thought. No wonder the police are wanting to strike. Strike? Police? Yes and absolutely without precedent. Anywhere I believe. But here in the UK the police are considering seeking the right to strike for the first time. [Not totally without precedent: I stand corrected.] And for once I don't blame them.

I'll leave you with one last thought: Whose idea do you think it was to send computer-written Victim Support letters and Support Packs to Victims Of Mobile Phone Theft? I doubt it was the Police.

20 December 2007

Heartfelt request








Some of the content below contains adult material that you could find offensive.
Be warned.









From the hidden society of online dating, an updatable selection of interesting statements of intent...

Some are fantastic, some just hilarious. If you indeed wrote anything featuring below, then someone else must've by coincidence and this is just for fun:

P.S. Please no plunging necklines!

If youre havin girl problems I feel bad for ya son.

Work in Oldham - Live in Ancoats. Living the dream.

The ' Radio 4 ' of Gaydar ! Sex Factor for the over 55+ to 80 with Scottish Windows !

Looking for a healthy relationship which is 2 (!) people, one very busy bedroom, respect and faithful manners.

Not Brad Pitt but not Mr Bean either.

Gym Fanatic and PowerFucker

Im horney little bustard looking for sum fun times with str8 or married men. just like the feeling of not aloud to do this but fucking love it!

Here I am, yet again [he is 18]

There is nothing wrong with going to bed with someone of your own sex. People should be very free with sex, they should draw the line at goats.

If you want to meet please have at least 3 of the list below.
1. Handsome face
2. Fit body
3. Hairy chest and back
4. Bubble butt
5. Red hair
6. Black skin
7. Thick cock

please don't bother me if you don't have clear face picture, shyness is infantile here.

Online: Gone to psychiatrist. Dinner in washer.

If all you’re going to do is talk about suicide or how much you hate the world and how everyone should just "fuck off and leave you alone", just keep going because I’m not interested in being friends. My sympathy towards strangers has run dry.

Unwilling to change my opinions or appearance just to get laid.

Quite sexual and passionate but not looking for McShag.

Friendly and well hearted. Bit of Greek attitude on me.

Just needs a fuck.... Seeing as my boyfriend is too busy in his own little world looks like someone else is gonna have to do it.

I am not looking for crazy ones because I was already crazy one time and it was not good.

I do think I have a sense of humor.

Sorted, sane, mature and lier

There's more to life than being fucked up the ass

I WANT A BRITISH HUSBAND and to settle in the UK -- Living stateside past 2 years. Can Travel at moment's notice...

I'm described by my friends as a typical blond and a geniune nice guy.

stubble is pure laziness.

With MRSA infections now an issue with gay health I am even more careful.

do u have any v I could buy off you? I'll give u a tenner for 4 ....... or £3 for 1

HUNG TOP - private roof terrace in the sun

About: zero. Looking for: everything

like a man, only shorter. there is very little scene wise in Wimbledon.

Casting for fuck buddies

On the road, London, Mancs, Dublin and everywhere

Ugly Fukker I know but cant all be handsome

I wonder how many lifetimes would equate to the number of hours all the members on this site have devoted to their muscles, all that energy expended.

owner a firm

I have a really bad phobia on sticky out belly buttons, Sorry If you have got one, no offence but they really scare me.

if u prefer people and not cooks or bottoms... i'm here

Lately I seem to be attracted by Arabs, Blacks and Brazilian

Regarding a LTR, I'm looking for monogamy, mental health.

twatedagain

NOW BACK WITH B/F AFTER 2MONTH BREAK BEEN 2GETHER

I don't exchange votes on SexFactor

To top it all, I seem to be giving out a vibe which works its magic particularly well on non-creepy goodlooking gay men, telling: DO NOT COME NEAR…

not into catalogue sex.

I'm looking for a straight active TOP guy

"PROFFESIONAL"

i never ask for or expect reciprocation and i like to give free reign to my users ;). gay sex (the casual variety at least) is never a relationship of equals, someone always prevails and someone gets walked all over. i know some guys flip between these 2, but to be frank, i can't do the prevailing bit, so i may as well resign myself to always be the door matt with a smile ;))

i need a fag to woo my ass

i can not say much of myself, as i think i dont really
know myself.

Be original .... The number of times a week you attend gym is of as much interest to me as the number of times you visit the supermarket

man was given two heads ... but only enough blood to run one at a time ... discuss ...:p)

muscled ones come to the front however if that's all u got 2 offer, move on (???)

hot brasilian escorte dude for your funny

looking for sex but getting lies and videotape :(

THIS PROFILE IS ONLY FOR SEX IF U WANT TO KNOW MORE ABOUT ME ASK ME AND I WILL GIVE U MY GAYDAR PROFILE

I am a fitnees instructor and a cool guy

(Hove is in Brighton not London). Must have facial photograph.
Manners cost nothing, so please say something!!!

Why are there so many rude ignorant tossers on here???

My life is more detailed than what I could possibly put here.

I'll be in London on 3 of May and have to spend the whole day alone, so I'm looking for a guy just to walk around the city together, and then, if we both want it, to have sex

100% straight bi

Currently vers-passive.

I want some person no false for to live forever...

If one more person writes 'sup' to me I swear I'll buy a baseball cap and wear it backwards.

DAMN!! I forgot to go to the gym!

I wish I could quit you! ;)~

Not looking for anything at the moment.

75% passive.

would like to meet, have a cup of tea/coffee and talk rather than being imprisoned within this virtual dungeon...

I LOOKINGS GAYS OF 18 and 30 YERS OLD
TO SEXY IN ME STUDIO

I'm a nice guy...
Just for funny!!!

I want somebody about who I can say WITHOUT YOU, EMOUTION WOULD BE SCARF OF YESTERDAY

[man says] i'm looking for a nice, good hetero looking man!

Hey, I am a nice down to earth guy that is looking a bit of everything ;)

I LOCK FOR BOY FRIEND......

And if you find somone to love the you you love, well, thats just fabulous

Foreign guy looking for sex date 7-11 Jan 08 in my hotel in Chigwell (London).

Looking for hot long sex session, With some break for a drink and fags

Where's the poke button?

I`m equally at home in a museum or a sex club

Hi there Mr. Right. I knew I'd meet you some day. Sure, I don't ask you to be perfect! Just be real and have real feelings, like me. Oh, yes, we will have fun and we shall share much more than a bed. I love cooking for you, giving and receiving the best each deserves from the other. I love good things in life and I appreciate to be with you in those moments. I live in Brazil, but this is something we can change

straight acting, no hang ups..

Truth be told - In Cardiff next week for Xmas

12 December 2007

Underground wealth

Having been on the Intelligence Squared mailing list for donkey's years, it was about time I actually attended one of their debates. If my first experience in London's Central Methodist Hall on December 11 is a fair barometer, then I have been missing out. As I've been generally anti-war as regards the debacle that was and is Iraq, I've read a lot and watched many a debate on the intellectual spaghetti junction that this western foreign policy project comprises. What I didn't expect, then, was such an invigorating discussion about quite possibly one of the most heavily debated international affairs in all time.

My own anti-invasion stance was not born of ignorant, intransigent, I'll-die-for-the-party nonsense. I'm a very strong believer in that your opinions must constantly be updated (and therefore occasionally reversed) when you recieve new and validated information; the alternative being synonymous with religious dogma (Nassim Nicholas Taleb has a lot to say about this in his popular Fooled By Randomness).

Back in the run-up to Gulf War II let's say I was not exactly convinced by the PR case for invasion, sold as the now historically infamous weapons of mass distraction super-lie. Oderint dum metuant. At the time it wasn't a lonely position. Then something happened that quick-dry cemented my position and taught me a saddening but valuable lesson about the flavour of democracy that we are actually living in. I went along to the early 2003 Stop the War megamarch in central London. Despite the fair-ish evaluation of the event by that linked article, it was with a heart-chilling horror that I watched the coverage on the BBC TV news of that evening. I can't find it on the internet unfortunately, but let's say 'gloss-over', 'play-down', and 'trivialise' don't even get close to how that report boiled me in outrage. Irrespective of the fact that the UK was witnessing possibly one of it's largest and most significant demonstrations ever, at the time the Beeb was only able to portray it with the significance of a W.I. Tea Party. It dawned on lil' ole naïve me that the PR machine behind this one was a leviathan and that the free BBC was just a dream.

Fast-forwarding to the IQ^2 debate (now somewhere between one hundred thousand and one million deaths later, depending on who you read, e.g.), the event was structured around 3 (artificially) competing positions on what the coallition should do now:
- stay until 'we win',
- leave after a negotiated settlement,
- leave immediately.

The organisers had done a faultless job of selecting the characters to represent these motions, including the excellent and well-placed ex regional interim Iraq Governer Rory Stewart. Another representative, Tony Benn, naturally represented the anti-war-leave-now party. Whether you like him or not, he often speaks a lot of sense when it comes to Iraq and UK foreign policy in general. However he got himself in quite a pickle at one point when, equating terrorist and military action via a moral relativity argument, he outraged the 'don't condemn our boys in the army' set. But, when people sit back and really think about it, it is generally true; there is not necessarily a moral difference between a soldier and a suicide bomber. The identification of the moral higher ground is not independent of perspective. This will be one of the previously unthinkable yet universally accepted moral truths of the future.

Anyway, my one problem with that evening's event is equivalent to the problem that is now the impasse of Iraq. The 3 postions contructed to engage a lively debate are far from mutually exclusive policies. To 'win' surely implies reaching a 'negotiated' settlement so I was left unconviced about the opposing polarity of these 2 motions. Then the middle ground settlement-first camp conceded that if no agreement could be reached then a quick exit would be inevitable, so kind of like the 'get out now' team really. Confused? I was. It is.

The reports, comments and analysis of the panel and the contributing audience served well to illustrate the horrible complexity that is the reality of Iraq today. So much time was spent arguing, for instance, on whether the recent thankful reduction in sectarian violence is explained by the recent troop 'surge' or other important factors such as the truce with Muqtada al Sadr. Most probably both, obviously, and measuring the effectiveness of either in isolation would be an unthinkable experiment so stop bickering. Nevertheless, amongst the myriad factors important in the equation that is Iraq, one important one was and is neglected in this debate; the black stuff, oil, of course.

There was some discussion on whether Iraq was about oil, inevitably, but it was seriously underweighted. Personally, I don't think Iraq is entirely explicable in terms of oil; America's political and popular need for aggression post September 11, notwithstanding Afganistan, is an equally considerable factor, at least as a significant trigger. But look it is this way: remove the variable and do you get the same result? Would we now be 5 years and $1.2 trillion and £5 billion into this operation if Iraq did not sit on top of one of world's largest and most accessible reservoirs of oil? Over 100 billion barrels apparently. In other words approximately $10 trillion at today's prices.

Of course the arguments can be extended here. The baathists would possibly not have succeeded in their ignoble tyranny without oil revenue either (being a minority who inhabited oil-starved regions then tyranny was surely the only option), so possibly fighting the baath and securing oil is actually the same thing.

The one crucial relationship markedly lacking from the whole debate was the one between oil, settlement and 'winning'. Whether the perceived need to secure the oil supply to the 'West' or just secure the lion's share of its revenue explains the invasion or not, there is no way the US government will now leave without having a very favorable arrangement in place regarding its access and exploitation of that resource. The devil is in the detail. The detail of the contracts. Just as in all contracts, the small print.

The coalition's attempts to set up a valid, representative government in Iraq have so far been deemed disasterous. Are the demands for oil revenue too high to enable a successful settlement for a self-governing Iraq? The ever-stalling negotiations are often attributed to interregional arguments withing Iraq, but is this really the true picture? There is an extremely expensive military operation to pay for after all.

The sectarian violence control argument, as terrible as the sectarian violence actually can be, is a distraction when used in relation to the coalition's exit strategy policy. We (the US?) will not leave until a deal is reached on the control and revenue of Iraq's existing and to be discovered oilfields. This is the debate that now needs to take place in the public consciousness and it is sadly lacking.

Economic arguments help explain all conflict, because economics is nothing more than the study of people and their motives. Yet there is always a reluctance to acknowledge this in popular debate and the media combined. It's like when no-one mentions access to water when discussing the Israeli-Palestinian problem. On one hand, distraction, smokescreens and decoys are often encouraged. On the other, emotion, tribalism and violence - all acting as a proxies for the economic struggle to secure resources - sells a lot more newspapers. Talking economics dirties a war. But wars are economic in origin. And wars are always dirty.

10 December 2007

It's made to be dull for a reason

Yet again there are things going on in finance of much import to the (wo)man on the street. The consideration it might deserve is however is not exactly guaranteed. One problem (or advantage, depends on your perspective) being it competes poorly with certain reincarnated canoeists or X-factor nonsense, especially in the Advent social calendar. The other being of course that anything to do with finance feels a) inextricably dull and b) a bit tricky to understand.

Duller than all, but maybe more important for most: pensions. Oh god, even the word sounds so dull. But again, depending on your interests, maybe it's supposed to. But over the weekend and continuing today is some UK government scolding (particularly aimed at Brown and Darling) for not guaranteeing pension rights to 125 000 workers who lost their entitlement due to financial failure of their employers. Not to tar the whole administration with the same brush; apparently the cabinet is deeply divided on the issue and internal critism is extraordinarily strong. One is left wondering why Brown and Darling are blocking the support and what their motives are. It doesn't look like the hallmark of a liberal-left government in any case.

If this is reminiscent to you of a potential bailout then that would not be incorrect. And then of course the Northern Rock bell might well ring again in your head. But for the common characteristic of potential financial life raft, it is the contrasts in the two cases that are far more illuminating. Northern Rock's rescue involves a sum so large that it would feature prominantly in the UK PLC's annual accounts (if such a dream of transparency were ever to materialise), the last time I checked it was not far behind the UK's annual 'defence' budget and approaching circa £30 billion. Naturally, the treasury expects (aka hopes) to get a sizeable proportion of this back. The other noteworthy difference in the two cases is the speed of response. The mortgage lender's failure was met, to the government's short-term credit (to be discussed further), with national emergency response times. As soon as uncomfortably long queues of savers developed in the City of London, swift action was required to calm ensuing panic and a stave off a self perpetuating, disasterous bank run. This is London 2007 and not late 90s Buenos Aires and we will not have the national savings stashed under beds thank you very much.

Back to the pensioners. The scheme to fund the payments of the short-changed 125 000 is undeniably paltry in comparison. And to be fair they should recieve up to 80% of their disappeared annuity. Note this is far from a new story and many have not yet recieved this. Why the delay? Why the neglect? Why the political risk to confidence in pensions?

Pensions are considered, in some qualified circles, something of a misnomer. The word originates from pendere (to pay, weigh) and describes a notion of payment for service rendered. Not sure how the 125k aforementioned bankruptcy victims would swallow that one. To some, including me, any confidence at all in the entire pension system is something of a total mystery. A complete conundrum. The deal is thus: you allocate a proportion of your wealth to an agent, that agent will invest that wealth on your behalf and then you can capitalise on it when you are in your 60s. The bonus: you can invest this money before tax and so benefit from that otherwise-taxed proportion contributing to compounding interest. In principle, this makes an enormous difference and is quite possibly one of the most important and least appreciated characteristics of (personal) finance. The catch: the money is locked away for a long time and during that time you have absolutely no control (beyond your limited democratic influence) on future government legislation dictating the fate or availability of your money. Put like that, the whole prospect starts to look a lot less attractive. But that invest-and-accrue-your-tax carrot is a big one. The purpose: a massive proportion of national wealth is locked in long term to either government funds or capital markets. For supporting economic stability in this way you should be, in theory, rewarded in your retirement.

And so on to the agents. This is either the government (i.e. state pensions) or private fund managers. It looks to me like UK state pensions are all but disappeared so what of the private sector? As far as I know (and I would love to be corrected here) no pension (or US mutual -) fund manager has ever consistently beaten the market over the mid - long term. This means, effectively, that the future pensioner is paying an agent a non-insignificant fee to invest in a market but that investment actually yields less that the market made itself over the same interval. The stockpickers are maybe not so hot at picking stocks or their fees are too high, maybe both.

In any case, despite the huge tax incentive, this all makes pensions rather unattractive to me. And I'm not alone. So I wonder why, in a story like the one above, the UK government may risk a system's already debatable credibilty.

**********************************************************************************

So, from pensions to another dreary, but more immediately-experienced matter of finance: inflation. And the oft-regurgiated (in the press, by the government) case of restricting wage rise to control inflation. It would be fair enough, if the implied relationship were known to be true. Any public sector pay dispute is invariably accompanied with a technocratically-sounding anti-inflation justification to limit increases below any decent level. The argument goes, as often sold by the paymaster or the analysis-starved subservient sector of the press and TV, that to overly support 'excessive' pay rises is to drive up inflation and so in the end batter the economy and increase unemployment. But the factors driving inflation are diverse and complex and to allude to this simple non-existent wage rise = inflation = unemployment relationship is nonsense. What of the evidence that wage growth fuels consumer demand and so is of economic benefit? What a surprise!

So the relationship between earnings, inflation and employment is not exactly thoroughly understood. For people to argue against a deserved, modest pay rise on the basis of inflation, as in the case of the current UK civil service pay dispute, is utterly disingenuous as they have no evidence that the legend is true. If the government cannot afford, for example, to pay the civil service more, then say so, with real justification, but please stop blaming the ghost of inflation in the cupboard. And will the media sector that joins in stop churning out the same groundless nonsense and maybe engage a more involved debate?

Strong inflation erodes the value of money, akin to accelerating your own death; making you less and less effective every day in the future. It is a vicious poison that has to be abated - and central banks have not been doing a terrible job of it recently. But to use a bogus threat of inflation on those who are owed a correct price for the services they provide to the state is simply wrong.

How often have you heard the same government or the same media accuse city bonus recipients of being such inflation supporting scourges? And it's not unlikely that when it comes to price rises in certain markets, those concerned are not at all uninvolved. In economically favorable times, firms are naturally keen to increase their prices as much as is possible to build profit. I wonder what this does to inflation? And, oh yes, energy prices. Which would you be more scared of: the price of oil or the Job Centre staff getting 2.5%?

1 December 2007

Seasonal Adaptation

It's somehow weird and especially amazing how we adapt to change; just two weeks ago I was complaining how I wasn't ready for winter this year - the effect heightened by the oyxmoron that was 'Summer 2007' [except for that amazing month of April]. So it was with much trepidation that I returned to Austria 2 weeks ago, for some undeniably wintry affairs.

I’d recently decided to have a bash at furthering my ski instructor training, having entered this different – and much misunderstood – world the previous year. As I am applying my newly-coined phrase of “temporary retirement” to my own life at present then it was easy to find the time. Given the level of training you get on these things, they are also definitely worth their reasonable cost. So, the twinned obstacles of time and money that so often get in the way were for once felled, and off I went. Back to Austria, the 'land of the bergs' as per the national anthem [credit to Alban]. At least that’s accurate; is the Queen of England and … where is she Queen of exactly? I forget. She’s more popular in Canada than Scotland. Good job I don’t have to do that Citizenship Exam. But in terms of anthemic accuracy, is she gracious? Sorry, going off the point there again...

So, I returned to the more correctly-themed Austria for more ski training. I’d done the first part of the Austrian system, known as the Anwärter (candidate) in non-winter 06/07 (spot the theme) and worked as an instructor in the beloved Arlberg, in St Anton. Was a bit of a dream come true thing really and at age 34 it was fucking scary. But that’s another story. This time I was going to have a go at the next level, Landeslehrer I, with the Viennese Ski Instructor Association, aka Snowsport Academy. Logical progression, fair enough. However, the system is distinctly non-linear – almost logarithmic really – the jumps between subsequent levels becoming ever larger and more daunting. Hence, yet again I was shit scared about what I was letting myself in for.

Many friends were delighted I was going back. Please try and not misread that, they just knew how much I got out of it and so were happy I was returning for more. Others also said things like, "ooo how lovely, enjoy the holiday". Enjoy the fucking holiday?! You have no idea. We are talking pseudoarmy here. Ok, without the shouting. And yes, with more fun. But it’s a difficult thing to describe; everyone has experience of training and examination of an academic nature, but the same process applied to physical capabilities is a stranger one, at least for me anyway. I suppose at least when you write an exam, no-one is watching what you write at the time.

Sunday lunchtime, cold and a bit dreary. Zell am See Bahnhof, Salzburger Land. It was November 18. Snowy. Already. Quite a lot. Compared to the previous season this was already fantastic. And I stood there, rucksack fusing with my back, coffin-weight dual ski bag (aka ‘Granddad’) nesting itself in the fresh snow. What the fuck? How did this happen? Only a few days ago I was still whinging I wasn’t ready for winter yet. But winter doesn’t wait. And even though I’d last skied on April twentysomething of this year (after a solid 4 months bar 2 days), the very thought of skiing felt so foreign to me. How odd is that?

Then, despite me remaining a relapsed smoker, something overcame me with a twinkle of a reminder of why I love this environment so much. I breathed. And noticed. Oh, the air, the clean, crisp, delicious mountain air. After months in a hyperpolluted environment such as central London, the first breath of this air is the respiratory equivalent of a long cold drink after a desert hike. You can feel the breathing, and it is simply amazing; a pulmonary orgasm. And then you, yet again, resolve to try and smoke less. Invigorated and feeling more positive, I dragged the kit on the bus and headed up to Kaprun.

What was to follow comprised ten exhausting, thrilling, sometimes almost gruelling days of fun - and all with an austrian german soundtrack; my basic german is good, but basic is the word. 6:30 starts, intensive ski training until late afternoon with a quickish lunch and then theory lessons all evening straggling dinner. Bed about 10, rinse and repeat. It's quite a shock to the system, especially as this was the beginning of the season. The leg pain (especially post moguls), best illustrated by trying to climb the stairs, only slightly assuaged by the observation that it was a universal problem.

But within a day or two, something imperceptible had happened; I was a skier again - maybe an instructor - again. I was loving winter, loving the white stuff, which so early in the season was floating out of the ski in reassuringly large, cristalline quantities. One day absorbed or embroiled in urban dealings and goings on, then so soon after automatically strapping on the avalanche beeper while still half asleep. It's like something latent lies dormant through the summer and then comes to life at the sight of snow. A kind of reverse hibernation. Amazing really.

As tough as the course was, it was in equal quantity incredible fun. The training was brilliant, pushing everyone to their limit but using new school positive encouragement technique rather than other more dubious protocols I've experienced in various forms of training in my life. I learnt a lot about how to get the best out of people while working as a ski instructor. An instructor's principle role most of the time is some form of practical psychologist, encouraging people to overcome their innate fear with a toolbox of technical tricks and movements. The more I think of it, the more I believe ski teacher training should be compulsory for all managers in every kind of enterprise. Face it, you're not going to get someone to overcome their fear on a mountain and perform their best by shouting, bullying or some other common, undeclared management technique.

The gem in this course though (and definitely my key to passing) was the people. The organisers and trainers were enthusiastic, inspirational people and generally nice guys. And my group colleagues were simply brilliant. Diverse characters, ages, nationalities but a great group dynamic. Everyone under pressure to perform, sometimes satisfied, often despondent and exhausted but all just bursting with team spirit and encouragement...maybe a bit of love? I cannot tell you how refreshing that is and how grateful I was to be in that environment. I've often had the delight of witnessing alternative group dynamics we all know too well in other formative or possibly competitive situations, so it's just a joy to see how it can be.

A shame it's not more often like that. So, who fancies a ski?

A final note about Ryanair's (actually excellent despite the banana yellow seats) flight to Salzburg. What is the deal with those scratch cards and "childrens charities"? Why is Ryanair’s new PA voice American? Offered for onward travel from Stansted: “We also sell bus tickets with television”. I didn't inquire about price. But before I mock the stewardess's substandard english, I remind myself she'd just done a 12 hour day. Ouch.

13 November 2007

Banishing the hungry

From: Simon Jones [mailto:drsrjones@hotmail.com]
Sent: 13 November 2007 13:30
To: oliver.hatch@londoncouncils.gov.uk
Subject: London Local Authorities Bill - Nov 2007 - Free Refreshment Distribution

Dear Mr Hatch:

I am writing to comment on the proposal to criminalise the distribution of food and drink on council-designated land in London, as defined in your consultation document, with a expressed focus of preventing homeless ‘soup-runs’.

When one first reads this, it is with some sense of disbelief. The potential heartlessness of such a move has led some to comment on the internet that this must in fact be a joke, albeit a bizarre one.

However, unfortunately this is not a joke but rather a serious proposal being put forward by a genuine proposer. It would, naturally, be interesting to know who or what community or commercial interest is in fact behind this. Given this affects the use of public land (note my use of term rather than council-designated) then I would expect a transparent declaration of all interests to be appropriate here.

In any case, given the very limited information provided by the above-referenced document, it would appear that the problem being raised is nuisance to properties adjacent to soup-runs, whether residential or commercial.

Now, the first thing I think is important here is the use of the word nuisance; it’s a dangerous term. Nuisance, used euphemistically, can simply be an expression of nimbyism - “we don’t want that sort around here” - kind of thing. However, nuisance can also be very serious, including anything from noise and litter to harassment and even violence. Abolishing the right to give food in a public place to those in need (something that may actually be enshrined in law) is an extremely serious proposal. It is a right any citizen possesses today. Given the potential seriousness of this matter, I would say then that it is the responsibility of London Councils to be much more explanatory and descriptive when outlining such a position and not rely on imprecise terms such as nuisance, without any accompanying evidence.

The second important thing I note from this proposal comes from its different possible interpretations. It’s very easy to have an instinctive reaction of horror when reading this – a revulsion at the fact that in 2007’s London the rich will gladly banish the destitute from their doorsteps, harking back to Dickens’s days. But hold on, this ‘nuisance’ thing again... Is it simply people not wanting to have the hungry fed in their vicinity? If so, then the horror is indeed genuine, and indeed society is regressing backwards so quickly then I don’t even want to see the future. If this is simple heartlessness then London Councils must screw a million copies of this proposal up and throw them all in the middle of Lincoln’s Inn Fields or some other common soup-run location. Then that really will be nuisance. London Councils also represent the homeless, although by definition not having a fixed address they are a lot less vocal.

But, and this is a big but, what if this nuisance is real nuisance? A source well acquainted with soup-runs comments that they can be accompanied by “scuffles and bullying” and gang activity can be present. Now things start to look rather different. However, if such problems are occurring, then banning soup-runs is hardly the solution. Those people need to be fed (and receive all the other ancillary services at such locations: advice, fact-finding, support etc). So if this a matter of riverains having to deal with genuine trouble caused by some / a small number / a tiny minority of soup runs and raising a genuine issue with the London Boroughs then it surely cannot be local government’s response to simply say, ‘oh, ok, we’ll ban them then’.

Might the councils otherwise feel some obligation to provide indoor facilities for food distribution? Or possibly policing the system in some way? I’m always seeing Southwark’s ‘Community Wardens’ doing nothing much at all around Shad Thames and More London, maybe they could help? Nevertheless, this unintelligent knee-jerk response is exactly the most terrible solution to this potential but not-yet-quantified problem. Let’s hope some rationality prevails and that the authorities deign to actually engage with the organisations concerned to improve this situation. Else someone go wake up Dickens.

When engaging the public on this matter London Councils need to better summarise the real extent of any problem. One expert in this area, Jon May at Queen Mary, does not seem to think there are any of the problems I discuss above.

On a final note, there is something in this proposal that leaves a very bad taste in the mouth (pun excusing notwithstanding); the proposal contains a proposed exemption: free sample distribution for marketing purposes outside retail premises. The irony, now I feel really sick.

Please don’t do this.

Best regards,

Dr Simon Jones